From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfXta-0007oh-G7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:21:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAP7KGhp007312; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:20:16 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAP7Gvai016027 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:16:57 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6BB9E3E18 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:16:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12921-02 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDDE9BE838 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:16:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:16:51 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19210180426.20051125081651@gentoo.org> To: Flammie Pirinen Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051125090651.30fb5866@pingviinilohhari> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <20051123112111.GG2257@toucan.gentoo.org> <4386A441.5050409@gentoo.org> <20051125090651.30fb5866@pingviinilohhari> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------3C962241E30FF24" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.639 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.639] X-Spam-Score: 0.639 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 614f3dd2-9d02-4273-b1ba-43f6290095a7 X-Archives-Hash: ab8034b719768e6f6abf212d146e6cf4 ------------3C962241E30FF24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A25.11.2005, 8:06:51, Flammie Pirinen wrote: > 2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta: >> So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to=20 >> Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in the meantime. > Uh-oh. The usability regression from what the site was yesterday is > unbelievable. Almost all of the texts are too small to read again, and > the color combinations are also unreadable again. I hope that you and > Aaron are still going to take into account at least all the usability > related requests from the feedback you asked, because I'd be pretty > annoyed to see yet another web site redesign that manages to make > original website even more unusable than it was. Ouch, what happened again?!... I can't agree more. I object to any redesign= if the whole thing was arranged so badly that all the accessibility flaws are = to be considered an unchangeable part of the "design". Better stick w/ the cur= rent one in that case. :-( --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEB= A3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) ------------3C962241E30FF24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDhrpihxfV/c66PZ4RAilXAJ4+RywpS5YEIKiCTdAN97eQKuT0lwCdGTeo K8WJxygQYEah1VDmVTOyAl4= =qqfa -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------3C962241E30FF24-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list