From: Jane Lee <jane_lee@mac.com>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude?
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:28:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1917602.1109618900897.JavaMail.jane_lee@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc582f6dcd5638b526e9171e5d534708@gentoo.org>
On Sunday, February 27, 2005, at 03:13PM, Lina Pezzella <j4rg0n@gentoo.org> wrote:
>This thread brings up a very good point. There are little children
>using our distribution, and they should not be exposed to dirty words
>such as the one being disputed in this thread. There are other packages
>that are also questionable too. "BitchX" comes to mind, and "Evolution"
>is on the top of my die-package-die list. We certainly wouldn't want
>little children asking about that, now would we?
>
>In light of the above, I suggest that in the interest of being sure not
>to offend anyone, we remove the three aforementioned packages and any
>others that might be offensive. It's not censorship, it's decency.
I'm sorry. I'm sure I'd be on the younger side of all the people actually reading all the stuff that goes on in this mailing list, being fifteen, but that someone would censor a package name because of a language that happens to have a vulgar (to some) name is unbelievable to me. Come on. I would think I get more exposure to offensive language from parents, friends, school and TV/movies, and seeing as how I've tried writing a few programs in brainfuck and I have used BitchX...I liberally sprinkle what I say with bad language when I see that there's a right occasion to do so. I'm sure I've said fuck more times in a day than there has been in this thread about one guy who just wants to use "brainfuck" in a package name instead of the censored version.
I think that younger people who have enough reading skills and technical ability to install Gentoo or sign up for a mailing list would be mentally capable of understanding that the use of language like that isn't necessarily meant to offend someone, but that it's just someone's creative spin on a name.
Sheltering "little children" from what is closer to being just another name more than offensive language is utterly pointless.
Feel free to disagree.
Cheers
Jane
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-28 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 20:44 [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-26 21:10 ` Jose Mª Calvillo aka Lechucks
2005-02-26 23:09 ` Collins Richey
2005-02-27 0:31 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-02-27 9:17 ` purslow
2005-02-27 9:28 ` Daniel Armyr
2005-02-27 9:40 ` purslow
2005-02-27 9:49 ` Krzysiek Pawlik
2005-02-27 13:54 ` purslow
2005-02-27 14:13 ` Krzysiek Pawlik
2005-02-27 14:52 ` znmeb
2005-02-27 15:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 19:30 ` Nick Dimiduk
2005-02-28 4:17 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-02-27 15:20 ` Simon Stelling
2005-02-27 17:40 ` Colin Kingsley
2005-02-27 18:01 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 6:23 ` D. Wokan
2005-02-27 9:54 ` Lars Strojny
2005-02-27 13:50 ` purslow
2005-02-27 14:04 ` Lars Strojny
2005-02-27 18:03 ` purslow
2005-02-27 18:17 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-01 6:28 ` D. Wokan
2005-02-27 18:18 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 20:36 ` John David Robinson
2005-02-27 20:52 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-02-27 20:56 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 22:51 ` John David Robinson
2005-02-27 21:45 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-02-27 21:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 21:28 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 21:36 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 21:42 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 21:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 21:51 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-02-27 22:05 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 22:34 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-02-27 22:53 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 23:14 ` Luke-Jr
2005-03-01 6:34 ` D. Wokan
2005-03-01 8:32 ` Luke-Jr
2005-02-27 22:54 ` Kumba
2005-02-27 23:07 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 23:55 ` Kumba
2005-03-01 6:36 ` D. Wokan
2005-02-27 21:59 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-02-27 22:07 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-02-27 22:31 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 22:39 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-02-27 22:20 ` Jason S
2005-02-27 23:11 ` Lina Pezzella
2005-02-27 23:24 ` Jason S
2005-02-28 0:12 ` Lina Pezzella
2005-02-28 0:29 ` Jason S
2005-03-01 6:49 ` D. Wokan
2005-02-27 23:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-02-28 1:40 ` Bill Davidson
2005-02-28 1:40 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-02-28 6:07 ` W.Kenworthy
2005-03-01 6:51 ` D. Wokan
2005-03-01 7:24 ` tchiwam
2005-02-27 23:55 ` Kumba
2005-02-28 19:28 ` Jane Lee [this message]
2005-02-28 19:39 ` Nick Dimiduk
2005-02-28 23:11 ` Jane Lee
2005-03-01 6:45 ` D. Wokan
2005-02-27 22:41 ` Lance Albertson
2005-02-27 23:03 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-02-27 23:14 ` Jason S
2005-03-05 21:29 ` Benjamin A. Collins
2005-03-05 21:42 ` Benjamin A. Collins
2005-03-05 23:46 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-02-28 10:23 ` Spider
2005-02-28 14:41 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-02-28 16:19 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 7:15 ` tchiwam
2005-03-01 8:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-01 9:53 ` tchiwam
2005-03-02 9:54 ` Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1917602.1109618900897.JavaMail.jane_lee@mac.com \
--to=jane_lee@mac.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox