From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnWgr-0006ku-4W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15B6EE0954; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8373E0954 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.75]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n8FBxCvi030113 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:12 +0200 Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n8FBxCtw016293; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:12 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n8FBxBMk016288; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:12 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19119.33167.859588.634168@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:11 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add "as-is" to @GPL-COMPATIBLE licence group In-Reply-To: <19108.47488.524476.286881@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <19108.47488.524476.286881@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.2-487 under Emacs 22.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 28137b3d-4230-4d54-9254-819ddca6f78f X-Archives-Hash: e46f299e98c2de2bbfa27dda9209287b >>>>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, I wrote: > Are there any objections against adding "as-is" to @GPL-COMPATIBLE? > It is less restrictive than the X11 licence (which is included). Looks like there are no objections, therefore I've added it. Ulrich