From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:41:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19106.45288.320802.835837@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA29E31.6090604@gentoo.org>
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> I suppose adding group license support in ebuilds will fix the problem
> too. But I see a few disadvantages like:
> - new behavior for @ operator: it will not only expand a group but also
> adding a || operator (only for LICENSE)
> - devs will have to maintain new groups
> - group support in LICENSE has no other need that managing versioned
> licenses
IMHO the main disadvantage is that ebuilds would have to be converted
to EAPI-4 for this, which is quite an effort for a very small
improvement. And I guess that there are quite a few packages currently
labelled as GPL-2 that are really "GPL 2 or later".
> But if everybody think groups are better, that will be fine.
I would prefer a pragmatic solution, like adding new licence files
as suggested in [1].
Ulrich
[1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c004fd342c57062d71455109fa52ac0.xml>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-05 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 22:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Mounir Lamouri
2009-08-31 22:30 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 20:50 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-01 2:21 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-01 5:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-03 21:10 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-03 21:15 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:27 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 4:53 ` Duncan
2009-09-04 15:01 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 18:52 ` David Leverton
2009-09-04 20:04 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-04 20:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-05 14:03 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2009-09-05 15:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-09-06 0:34 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-09-06 6:31 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-09-03 21:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-04 21:11 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 1:06 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 8:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-09-05 9:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-09-05 10:59 ` Zac Medico
2009-09-05 17:21 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-09-05 18:41 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2009-09-06 0:14 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-09-05 21:37 ` Zac Medico
2009-10-01 2:01 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-10-01 13:09 ` volkmar
2009-09-04 15:47 ` Jeremy Olexa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19106.45288.320802.835837@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox