From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D1C138239 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACA2BE08EB; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EBBE08E2 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tux200s.localnet (unknown [62.99.226.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: asturm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83E5134C3F2; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Sturmlechner To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: pr , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News Item v3: sys-fs/cryfs-0.10.2 update Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:58:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1910051.DuhM6fQHrS@tux200s> Organization: Gentoo In-Reply-To: References: <2364611.2xGvymeTQd@tuxk10> <1746509.WGgRJKmoJg@tuxk10> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: b78411a7-b7fe-4017-99b4-d4d9af8e56f4 X-Archives-Hash: 545d0c4e225587c2709ec8fa07ca0117 On Monday, 28 October 2019 at 11:54, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > > I'm aware that it's not required by policy to use the newest format, > but is there any particular reason for not using 2.0? None, I guess. Simple change then: Title: sys-fs/cryfs-0.10.2 update Author: Andreas Sturmlechner Posted: 2019-10-29 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: