From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZDZ3-0007wx-CS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:26:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA7KMbcD016886; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:22:37 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA7KE87n021729 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:14:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277B621C1FF for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:14:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20978-08-6 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:14:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from NOTORCOMP (21.217.broadband4.iol.cz [85.71.217.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343D887BAD9 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:14:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:13:56 +0100 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1908748240.20051107211356@gentoo.org> To: Grobian Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two In-Reply-To: <436FA6DB.1090509@gentoo.org> References: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> <436C8951.4010008@gentoo.org> <20051105111006.GA14844@kloeri> <436C9798.5020805@gentoo.org> <20051105114729.GB14844@kloeri> <436CAC58.4090809@gentoo.org> <1131309435.8543.16.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20051106214747.4e6a9cff@snowdrop.home> <1131382994.8546.34.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <436F9DC6.8040106@gentoo.org> <20051107184153.0530a19a@snowdrop.home> <436FA6DB.1090509@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------BF6F543E561004" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.2 (20050629) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_50=0.001, PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.097] X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: bbec1511-71bb-4301-a6ab-af3269be7ed5 X-Archives-Hash: adf6277fffc4237ef48e18dad2b636c2 ------------BF6F543E561004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A7.11.2005, 20:11:23, Grobian wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Grobian wrote: >> | So, what list should the user that wants to receive those >> | **important** messages sign up to? >>=20 >> That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up >> for things. > Doesn't matter. If the important messages aren't posted or you have to= =20 > extract them yourself the effect is the same. > Besides that, I see no arguments why users don't. No proof either. OK, I'd really suggest you join #gentoo-apache for a week, if you want some proof. Browsing forums.g.o. rants wrt the Apache layout changes is also hel= pful in this respect. ;p -- Jakub ------------BF6F543E561004 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDb7WEhxfV/c66PZ4RAj5UAJ9L+ICzFEtDb269J+2GixUh9CCOVgCfYgyn YcLxl3JmWU4WHhYY10ZhPZU= =LNNO -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------BF6F543E561004-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list