From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E182138334 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1B3DE07FA; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11E5E077D for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECB6E3492E8; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <18c04420b7e0993afdafade688803006d220a86d.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dynamic groups and users From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:58:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <76000f9a-31ac-f652-797a-d7494edac176@uls.co.za> <0797f90fd71fdcf9b1c3632f54d3ddf8f3ebddc1.camel@gentoo.org> <2a95f00b-f195-5ed9-3737-886e68039da9@uls.co.za> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wPlDqVdhH5gDHfW61ioo" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: cee9cfc8-4177-4379-9d36-4829d0be76c2 X-Archives-Hash: 022e0ab645416e02745674b25e247a7e --=-wPlDqVdhH5gDHfW61ioo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:46 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/2/19 5:53 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Sure. Please preferably address two of them separately, so we can > > commit the 0 patch first, and -1 when CI is ready. > >=20 >=20 > Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but what do we gain by adding support > for something that no real package should do? Is it just to avoid > thinking up any number and typing it in? >=20 Given that overlays won't do proper assignment, the numbers they choose may collide with numbers used in ::gentoo. Forcing explicit assignment from dynamic range is cleaner in that regard. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-wPlDqVdhH5gDHfW61ioo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl1EXZJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA7H+gf8CgBXHANKvpy+FwYCWk02fffuPoa4Xb8niHrSqDps6CF3IV72wfOlbvDP nsUfhqIfJxwG0DNvIhBB1yNZriPNjEHjVDBTCQuOwBKJKpK8a80GFzD4ZGpcY1cT 0EszU28bC4b9+LPbeCeSJkcMhucrx3FQR8NE1C9mat0EzY19Fn4NbdaVyPhSjTnz xLwgjIEVzvkN8yFfn2iag+Nk6imdhzeV1mLlreDt/i3nJR19P6QkIcoPNvMtuq7k Y/Qf12r2oeYfsQ6O5vlGwuFe+gXj99ortxEIOAvritm4FzPq+CKZ+r0ymddhcgJx 2qliWuwhxCy/PUgMkqF4QspfPftCIA== =ZIXY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wPlDqVdhH5gDHfW61ioo--