From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LftAa-0001hu-Eh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:50:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FA8EE003C; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (unknown [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAF5E003C for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.75]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n279o1Uw020951 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:50:02 +0100 Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n279o1SV001633; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:50:01 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n279o1Bc001613; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:50:01 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18866.17225.129454.389648@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:50:01 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI support In-Reply-To: <20090306205729.GC22566@comet> References: <20090306205729.GC22566@comet> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.2-487 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: e67fbb8d-3b2f-4a8b-955c-08149142507c X-Archives-Hash: 3c8f8938bb7e06f91b9915e65f6bdcde >>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Any thoughts? > + *) > + die "Unknown EAPI ${EAPI}" > + ;; Is is safe to assume that an unknown EAPI will provide a "die" function? Ulrich