From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcDe4-0007wr-Re for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:53:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05669E0387; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (unknown [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA802E0387 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.75]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n1P6rHJt007833 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:53:17 +0100 Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n1P6rHbs028741; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:53:17 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n1P6rHuR028736; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:53:17 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <18852.60124.933911.805465@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:53:16 +0100 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives In-Reply-To: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> References: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.2-487 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 1c75dd22-4c84-4580-a674-cca76dbbb963 X-Archives-Hash: 74417d051f403d62f4f635f517734dec >>>>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many > people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order > to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. I've already commented on this in December 2007 [1], and my opinion hasn't changed. > 1) Status quo > 2) EAPI in file extension > 3) EAPI in locked down place in the ebuild > a) > b) new subdirectory like ebuilds/ > c) .ebuild in current directory Acceptable for me would be 1) and 3c). > - needs one year wait Please state more precisely, what events would mark the beginning and end of this time period? Ulrich [1]