Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming?

["donnie berkholz" <spyderous@gentoo.org>]

>
> It seems to me that consistency would demand the same thing for
> *-update.  I've been in a situation where I've needed to run
> SOMETHING-update before, but couldn't remember what "SOMETHING" was.
> Being able to tab complete update-<tab> would be great!
>
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I just had an idea (how rare, eh?) and I wanted to see what other
>> people thought of it.
>>
>> What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config,
>> distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc,
>> config-distcc, config-java, etc.)?
>>
>> This would allow people trying to configure anything to simply type
>> config-<tab> and get a listing of what was available.

I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also for
consistency.



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list