From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4192 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Jan 2003 07:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22254 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2003 07:48:15 -0000 Message-ID: <1878.24.145.173.48.1041407197.squirrel@www.givemesomefood.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 01:46:37 -0600 (CST) From: "Nick Hadaway" To: In-Reply-To: <20030101010609.GA19093@mindbent.org> References: <20030101010609.GA19093@mindbent.org> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: Reply-To: raker@gentoo.org X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.12.4 - (http://pldaniels.com/inflex/) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-1.03-r9.ebuild? X-Archives-Salt: 647824f5-5e49-4e5a-b008-cea77129e65c X-Archives-Hash: 238e9a9da5a59745908a66af56d3ea43 I don't have any record of you sending me information. Please forward me any fixes or patches that you have which may alleviate current issues with qmail -r9. I have had limited responses from people. Some reporting things working well and other appearing not to be able to get things configured correctly. There is a bug currently which I have looked for responses on -r9. Here is a link for you... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808 Please if anyone has any suggestions or problems that they find, please let me know what your experiences are... log information is helpful as well. Yes, the unmasking of an updated ebuild is long overdue. -nick raker@gentoo.org Feel free to email me. :) I promise I will respond. Communication is ALWAYS a good thing. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list