From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrYf5-0002jj-QL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:49:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2D49E03D9; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5782AE03D9 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.75]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m9JDnauQ001420 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:49:36 +0200 Received: from a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9JDnaLa005030; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:49:36 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id m9JDnats005025; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:49:36 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18683.15087.837944.682775@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:49:35 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [v4] Planning for automatic assignment computation of bugs In-Reply-To: <20081019060114.GA21785@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20081019060114.GA21785@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.2-487 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 23156cbd-e354-49a1-a3c3-24711a80d744 X-Archives-Hash: 6fdcaa8fcb52b5a32781878a707c7aa0 >>>>> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote: > 3. If you want the default assignment to go to a maintainer, and NOT > the herd, move the element further down in the metadata.xml! I disagree about this point. IMHO the procedure described in makes more sense: # When the file [i.e., metadata.xml] lists multiple entries, then you # assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other # maintainer(s) and herd(s). > 2. This email is treated as an implicit maintainer element after this > point. "${HERD_EMAIL}" Explicit maintainer elements should have precedence over implicit ones. Ulrich