From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D678313877A for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FF28E0BD3; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBBFE0B9A for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localnet (unknown [114.91.164.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 611B6340076 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Docker 1.0.0 masked for no known reason? Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:23:21 +0800 Message-ID: <1867928.PVtiAeD6pB@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.13.1-gentoo; KDE/4.13.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1850798.4K95jJtFKj@localhost> References: <20140629025822.GB22414@kroah.com> <20140629101222.0a8205ed@gentoo.org> <1850798.4K95jJtFKj@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 04d36388-5255-408f-bfff-566a8fee4b4b X-Archives-Hash: 20bc20bcd30f6307fb86ca82dadb92f2 On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 > > > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker > > > but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by > > > the virtualization team (and Diego (flameeyes). And docker depends on > > > lxc-1.0.0 according to the ebuild. But now that you have unmasked > > > docker, i think the deptree will be broken since lxc is still masked. > > > > Repoman is monitored; therefore, someone from the QA team or so has > > probably masked Docker. Given that broken dependency tree again it is > > likely to happen again. So, please set it up a satisfiable state. :) > > AutoRepoman :) > > So that was me fixing the depgraph, taking the easy way out of adding an > unsatisfiable package to an existing related package.mask. > > If people can't be bothered to even run repoman full or commit without > --force they'll get annoyed by my corrections - maybe it has an educational > effect ;) > > Have fun, > > Patrick Tadaah: dependency.bad 22 app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0']