public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:57:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1855889.PNdYk8xfIb@kailua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B17F3E.7040002@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1853 bytes --]


perl-core/Switch is now stabilized on "amd64 ppc x86", so this should be 
fixed.

> On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should
> > still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about
> > future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse
> > deps).
> 
> There shouldn't be any need to read minds, here -- if the previous
> stable perl had this capability, then the new stable perl should too
> (whether that be via internal or external module package).  If it
> doesn't, then the upgraded-new-stable-perl isn't a valid replacement
> for the stable version it previously replaced. Remember that there
> could be who knows what scripts on end-user systems that need this
> functionality, and if it's suddenly not available because the only
> thing that provides it is ~arch, then they are not left in a happy state..

I'm not fully buying this argument, since it would prevent us ever stabilizing 
a package where an upstream feature is removed. 

(Switch was first released with perl v5.7.3 and removed from v5.13.1. So there 
should have been lots of time to update dependency declarations or pull in the 
external package if needed for non-portage scripts.)

> It would be nice if something like a pkgmove be done on the virtual,
> though, upon its elimintation; anyone that installed the virtual to
> obtain perl Switch shouldn't have to unmerge and specifically emerge
> perl-core/Switch.  I'm not sure if pkgmove itself supports this, though..

I dont think this is what pkgmove does (this would move the "no installed 
files" vdb entry of the virtual to the perl-core name... we would need a 
functionality that only touches the world file alone...)

-- 
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
kde, council

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 966 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-01 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-29 15:49 [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family Andreas K. Huettel
2014-06-30  8:21 ` Tony Vroon
2014-06-30  8:46   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-06-30 15:16     ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-07-01 11:57       ` Andreas K. Huettel [this message]
2014-07-01 12:16         ` Re: " Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-01 18:55         ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-07-01 16:31       ` Samuli Suominen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1855889.PNdYk8xfIb@kailua \
    --to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=axs@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox