From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-94274-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1D11382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB14E089C;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C199E088C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Theo Anderson <telans@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:58:34 +0200
Message-ID: <1829406.6tgchFWduM@spectre>
In-Reply-To: <20210423014511.7d3feae3@genbox>
References: <13171428.RDIVbhacDa@spectre> <4291440.8F6SAcFxjW@spectre> <20210423014511.7d3feae3@genbox>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Archives-Salt: 16747af9-c455-4a6d-9a37-115f8eccf060
X-Archives-Hash: a72aed9470d1357204d29e3b52da9ba4

On gioved=EC 22 aprile 2021 15:45:11 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> Hi Agostino,
>=20
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
> assignee. If you could make those changes that would be great (I
> suppose doing it retroactively would be a bit of a mission and is out
> of the question).
>=20
> Thanks


Existing bugs have been re-assigned.

New bugs will be assigned to maintainer and guru is always CC'ed.
Packages with no maintainer will have guru@ as assignee.

If you notice anything wrong please let me know.

Agostino