From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion of Emacs virtual packages
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:06:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17993.37916.578366.696016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46499076.6090401@gentoo.org>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual
>> packages.
> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable
> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable,
> they are fine to go stable.
Yes, I think this part is clear.
The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.:
keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before
the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for
virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.)
Ulrich
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-15 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-15 10:44 [gentoo-dev] Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-15 10:51 ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-15 10:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-15 11:09 ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-15 10:53 ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-15 13:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-16 17:19 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 21:36 ` Ulrich Mueller
[not found] ` <46499076.6090401@gentoo.org>
2007-05-15 11:06 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2007-05-15 11:12 ` [gentoo-dev] Marking virtuals stable Petteri Räty
2007-05-23 11:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2007-05-30 19:55 ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-31 9:28 ` Michael Cummings
2007-05-31 13:36 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2007-05-31 15:41 ` Graham Murray
2007-05-31 13:52 ` Jeroen Roovers
2007-05-31 16:07 ` Michael Cummings
2007-05-16 17:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 17:52 ` Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-16 20:07 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-05-16 21:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> " William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-16 22:37 ` Thilo Bangert
2007-05-16 22:46 ` Jakub Moc
2007-05-16 23:04 ` Carsten Lohrke
2007-05-17 8:54 ` [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name Ulrich Mueller
2007-05-17 10:10 ` Raúl Porcel
2007-05-16 22:59 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages Ali Polatel
2007-05-16 23:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Kelly
2007-05-17 0:19 ` Georgi Georgiev
2007-05-17 7:49 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 14:59 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-17 15:03 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 16:48 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-05-17 16:53 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-05-17 17:07 ` Josh Sled
2007-05-17 17:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-05-17 17:57 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17993.37916.578366.696016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox