From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-67611-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23306138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C711E084F;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57716E083D;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localnet (unknown [58.35.111.197])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: patrick)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECF803401B3;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:30:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: Davide Pesavento <pesa@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-infrastructure@lists.gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org, council@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:30:36 +0800
Message-ID: <16601943.lz3Cz1dQbC@localhost>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.16.0-gentoo; KDE/4.14.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADfzvvbw8NM8BuCPyO2tRe+9OZhsyEFppNHdtDRO2M5RvwHyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140914140344.6c6b99e5@pomiot.lan> <CADfzvvbw8NM8BuCPyO2tRe+9OZhsyEFppNHdtDRO2M5RvwHyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Archives-Salt: fd825b09-e08e-4ec1-8ef3-849f32efebbb
X-Archives-Hash: ee774a4636b4e679dfd7a5fcb9f54d51

On Sunday 14 September 2014 15:40:06 Davide Pesavento wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gento=
o.org> wrote:
> > We have main developer repo where developers work & commit and are
> > relatively happy. For every push into developer repo, automated mag=
ic
> > thingie merges stuff into user sync repo and updates the metadata c=
ache
> > there.
>=20
> How long does the md5-cache regeneration process take? Are you sure i=
t
> will be able to keep up with the rate of pushes to the repo during
> "peak hours"? If not, maybe we could use a time-based thing similar t=
o
> the current cvs->rsync synchronization.

Best case only one package is affected - a few seconds
Worst case someone touches an eclass like eutils, then it expands to so=
mething=20
on the order of one or two CPU-hours.
=20
> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local
> changes in order to keep the history "clean"?

Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency?