From: Tom Syroid <tom@syroidmanor.com>
To: Matt Beland <matt@rearviewmirror.org>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:43:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15980000.1035315815@phaedrus.syroidmanor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021022191549.GA24779@rearviewmirror.org>
Hi Matt ;-) long time, no chat.
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:15:49 -0700 Matt Beland
<matt@rearviewmirror.org> wrote:
> We want the Gentoo team to let us know when they're going to
> let us take full advantage of the portage system again. Frankly, I (and
> I suspect most others) could care less about the 1.4 release in and of
> itself. Sure, a new version of the compiler and so on would be nice, but
> I can get that on my own if necessary. The problem is that the portage
> tree is frozen waiting for 1.4, and has been for some time.
Without trying to be contentious here (in other words, simple honest
question)...
I know you well enough that I can safely say you're not about to go off
using a new version of something on any kind of critcal box without testing
it first. So on the assumption that you have already discerned
program/tool/system utility is "ready for prime time", what's wrong with
simply edited the "frozen" entry in package.mask and installing it?
While I concur that the Gentoo development team as a whole could do a
better job of communicating TODO's and loose timelines to the community, I
don't see how a frozen Portage tree is preventing you from utilizing the
distribution in any way you heart desires.
Best,
/tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-21 15:25 [gentoo-dev] When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released? Iago Sineiro
2002-10-21 20:31 ` Michael Boman
2002-10-21 23:25 ` Jyrinx
2002-10-22 1:48 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-10-22 7:08 ` Iago Sineiro
2002-10-22 9:51 ` Luke Maurer
2002-10-22 13:45 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-22 14:49 ` Luke Maurer
2002-10-21 20:33 ` Evan Read
2002-10-22 15:28 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 17:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " 3.2.3
2002-10-22 19:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefano Peluchetti
2002-10-22 17:55 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 18:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " 3.2.3
2002-10-22 19:15 ` Matt Beland
2002-10-22 19:43 ` Tom Syroid [this message]
2002-10-22 20:06 ` Matt Beland
2002-10-23 12:13 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 20:42 ` Stefano Peluchetti
2002-10-21 20:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Fred Van Andel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 16:20 [gentoo-dev] " Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-27 20:25 ` Thomas M. Beaudry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15980000.1035315815@phaedrus.syroidmanor.com \
--to=tom@syroidmanor.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=matt@rearviewmirror.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox