* [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
@ 2003-03-01 15:34 Robert Cole
2003-03-01 21:22 ` Jeff Kowing
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Cole @ 2003-03-01 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
I recently noted a warning in the new make.conf file to not use the -pentium4
compiler option and to use -pentium3 instead. My entire system was built from
stage1 with -pentium4 and I'm not having any issues.
To be safe I switched it to p3 for now.
Anymore detail on this? Is this something that has to be fixed in gentoo
specifically or all source in general?
Robert
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
2003-03-01 15:34 [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3 Robert Cole
@ 2003-03-01 21:22 ` Jeff Kowing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Kowing @ 2003-03-01 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: robert.cole; +Cc: gentoo-dev
Robert Cole writes:
> I recently noted a warning in the new make.conf file to not use the -pentium4
> compiler option and to use -pentium3 instead. My entire system was built from
> stage1 with -pentium4 and I'm not having any issues.
>
> To be safe I switched it to p3 for now.
>
> Anymore detail on this? Is this something that has to be fixed in gentoo
> specifically or all source in general?
Robert, I was bit by at least one of the problems a while back. It
seems that some of the floating point code is not quite right yet for
pentium4. I believe this is a gcc and maybe glibc issue. The
particular example that caused me problems is the glibc modf()
function. See
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=27211&highlight=python+float
for more info and a sample c program that will highlight the problem.
It was suggested at the time by Nick Jones (see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/23056) that I back
down to pentium2. I haven't updated my portage recently, so I
haven't looked at what the new updated make.conf file suggests but I
definitely would follow any advice it gives.
--
Jeff Kowing
jeffrey.d.kowing@nasa.gov
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
@ 2003-03-02 14:37 Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-03-02 15:58 ` Riyad Kalla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay @ 2003-03-02 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Jeff Kowing said:
> Robert, I was bit by at least one of the problems a while back. It
> seems that some of the floating point code is not quite right yet for
> pentium4. I believe this is a gcc and maybe glibc issue. The
> particular example that caused me problems is the glibc modf()
> function. See
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=27211&highlight=python+float
> for more info and a sample c program that will highlight the problem.
>
> It was suggested at the time by Nick Jones (see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/23056) that I back
> down to pentium2. I haven't updated my portage recently, so I
> haven't looked at what the new updated make.conf file suggests but I
> definitely would follow any advice it gives.
I'm also using P4 and have not faced any problems. Would changing to P3
result in any noticeable drop in performance? Also, has gcc 3.2.2
compensated for this problem at all in comparison to previous releases?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
2003-03-02 14:37 Dhruba Bandopadhyay
@ 2003-03-02 15:58 ` Riyad Kalla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Riyad Kalla @ 2003-03-02 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user, gentoo-dev
I second these two questions...
-----Original Message-----
From: Dhruba Bandopadhyay [mailto:dhruba@codewordt.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 7:37 AM
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
Jeff Kowing said:
> Robert, I was bit by at least one of the problems a while back. It
> seems that some of the floating point code is not quite right yet for
> pentium4. I believe this is a gcc and maybe glibc issue. The
> particular example that caused me problems is the glibc modf()
> function. See
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=27211&highlight=python+float
> for more info and a sample c program that will highlight the problem.
>
> It was suggested at the time by Nick Jones (see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/23056) that I back
> down to pentium2. I haven't updated my portage recently, so I
> haven't looked at what the new updated make.conf file suggests but I
> definitely would follow any advice it gives.
I'm also using P4 and have not faced any problems. Would changing to P3
result in any noticeable drop in performance? Also, has gcc 3.2.2
compensated for this problem at all in comparison to previous releases?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-02 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-01 15:34 [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3 Robert Cole
2003-03-01 21:22 ` Jeff Kowing
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-02 14:37 Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-03-02 15:58 ` Riyad Kalla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox