public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kowing <jeffrey.d.kowing@nasa.gov>
To: robert.cole@support4linux.com
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:22:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15969.9362.40481.829880@igor.jsc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303010734.09181.robert.cole@support4linux.com>

Robert Cole writes:
 > I recently noted a warning in the new make.conf file to not use the -pentium4 
 > compiler option and to use -pentium3 instead. My entire system was built from 
 > stage1 with -pentium4 and I'm not having any issues.
 > 
 > To be safe I switched it to p3 for now. 
 > 
 > Anymore detail on this? Is this something that has to be fixed in gentoo 
 > specifically or all source in general?

Robert, I was bit by at least one of the problems a while back.  It
seems that some of the floating point code is not quite right yet for
pentium4.  I believe this is a gcc and maybe glibc issue.  The
particular example that caused me problems is the glibc modf()
function.  See
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=27211&highlight=python+float
for more info and a sample c program that will highlight the problem.

It was suggested at the time by Nick Jones (see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/23056) that I back
down to pentium2.  I haven't updated my portage recently, so I
haven't looked at what the new updated make.conf file suggests but I
definitely would follow any advice it gives.

-- 
Jeff Kowing
jeffrey.d.kowing@nasa.gov

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-01 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-01 15:34 [gentoo-dev] -pentium4 vs -pentium3 Robert Cole
2003-03-01 21:22 ` Jeff Kowing [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-02 14:37 Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-03-02 15:58 ` Riyad Kalla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15969.9362.40481.829880@igor.jsc.nasa.gov \
    --to=jeffrey.d.kowing@nasa.gov \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=robert.cole@support4linux.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox