[gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[Rolf Offermanns]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]

Can anyone help me with the following?

When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
*  sys-devel/flex
      Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
      Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
      Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
      Description: GNU lexical analyser generator

There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked, 
so why isn't it listed in the search?

Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I 
unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.

When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the 
following:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.

Calculating dependencies |

emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from 
ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.

I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?

-Rolf



--
Rolf Offermanns <rolf@offermanns.de>
OpenPGP public key available on request
Key fingerprint = A0AF 0A8D A8A9 9662 F558  385B 7B01 518F 545F F159

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[Rolf Offermanns]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]

Can anyone help me with the following?

When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
*  sys-devel/flex
      Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
      Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
      Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
      Description: GNU lexical analyser generator

There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked, 
so why isn't it listed in the search?

Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I 
unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.

When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the 
following:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.

Calculating dependencies |

emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from 
ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.

I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?

-Rolf




[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[Rigo Ketelings]

In short: new functionality..

Put :

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"

in your make.conf & you'll be fine..


Regards,

Rigo

On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
>
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> *  sys-devel/flex
>       Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
>       Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
>
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
>
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
>
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
>
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
>
> -Rolf

Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS !

[Rigo Ketelings]

<Quote who=bcowman@gentoo.org>

I did a work around for the sandboxing on ethereal 0.9.7, its now masked for
testing using new arch testing keywords. I'm gonna close this out could u 
please resubmit me the correct kismet ebuild :). BTW here are the 
instructions for unmasking arch testing keywords:

Another important snippet. If you want to unmask all ~x86 KEYWORDSed
ebuilds, add the following to your /etc/make.conf:

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is incremental like USE so it *will* keep the existing
"x86" that is defined in your profile. This can also be done using the
environment for temporary testing purposes:

# export ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" (or "~ppc" or "~sparc", etc.)


</Quote>

Rigo


On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
>
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> *  sys-devel/flex
>       Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
>       Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
>
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
>
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
>
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating dependencies |
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
>
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
>
> -Rolf

Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS !

[Evan Read]

Can you explain this functionality?

What does the "~" mean in this instance?

THanks

On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 00:53, Rigo Ketelings wrote:
> <Quote who=bcowman@gentoo.org>
> 
> I did a work around for the sandboxing on ethereal 0.9.7, its now masked for
> testing using new arch testing keywords. I'm gonna close this out could u 
> please resubmit me the correct kismet ebuild :). BTW here are the 
> instructions for unmasking arch testing keywords:
> 
> Another important snippet. If you want to unmask all ~x86 KEYWORDSed
> ebuilds, add the following to your /etc/make.conf:
> 
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
> 
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is incremental like USE so it *will* keep the existing
> "x86" that is defined in your profile. This can also be done using the
> environment for temporary testing purposes:
> 
> # export ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" (or "~ppc" or "~sparc", etc.)
> 
> 
> </Quote>
> 
> Rigo
> 
> 
> On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with the following?
> >
> > When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> > *  sys-devel/flex
> >       Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
> >       Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
> >       Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
> >       Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
> >
> > There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> > so why isn't it listed in the search?
> >
> > Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> > unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
> >
> > When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> > following:
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
> >
> > Calculating dependencies |
> >
> > emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> > ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
> >
> > I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
> >
> > -Rolf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
-- 
For security use OpenBSD: http://eread.freeshell.org/
"The future comes 60 minutes an hour no matter who you are or what you
do."
        The Screwtape Letters - C.S. Lewis

Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS !

[Martin Schlemmer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 282 bytes --]

On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 00:02, Evan Read wrote:
> Can you explain this functionality?
> 
> What does the "~" mean in this instance?
> 

Its marked for testing on that ARCH.


-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[Nicholas Wourms]

Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> Can anyone help me with the following?
> 
> When I do an emerge -s flex, I get
> *  sys-devel/flex
>       Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4
>       Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html
>       Description: GNU lexical analyser generator
> 
> There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked,
> so why isn't it listed in the search?
> 
> Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I
> unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed.
> 
> When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the
> following:
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
> 
> Calculating dependencies |
> 
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (from
> ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked.
> 
> I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked?
> 

Possibly a different subject, but are people aware that flex is now up to 
2.5.22?  Many fix0rs and such have been incorporated into the new version.  
Hit me up for the new maintainer's webpage.

Cheers,
Nicholas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: masking question (flex-2.5.4a-r5 / xfree-4.2.1)

[Martin Schlemmer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 491 bytes --]

On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 04:31, Nicholas Wourms wrote:

> Possibly a different subject, but are people aware that flex is now up to 
> 2.5.22?  Many fix0rs and such have been incorporated into the new version.  
> Hit me up for the new maintainer's webpage.
> 

Hmm, then not many people know it, as Redhat/MDK is also still on 2.5.4.

Anyhow, new URL will be appreciated.


-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]