From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE508138262 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7674614245; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDD321C028 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-73-53-75-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.53.75.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zlg) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6FD7340A5C for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20160519165130.7e9bc385@wim.fritz.box> From: Daniel Campbell Message-ID: <1564651c-9d89-1c3f-c97b-d56bdcfd5634@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 23:41:26 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tngOS1B6cd5agCmWd0mLKJTwluwq5LLQE" X-Archives-Salt: 7edeaa4c-795d-4ecd-a80e-2df93fa0816a X-Archives-Hash: 603840a04a861d72f29d5d910826211c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tngOS1B6cd5agCmWd0mLKJTwluwq5LLQE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dGmm8pgNoAXpx0kKitbTiCCg3QHN5BObs" From: Daniel Campbell To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <1564651c-9d89-1c3f-c97b-d56bdcfd5634@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests References: <20160519165130.7e9bc385@wim.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: --dGmm8pgNoAXpx0kKitbTiCCg3QHN5BObs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/20/2016 09:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote= : >> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some >> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that th= ey >> already maintain? >=20 > No, you've misunderstood. >=20 > He's saying people add new packages and then speculatively add > keywords for a bunch of architectures that they haven't tested. This > causes unnecessary packages to be keyworded on archs that don't want > them and can hardly afford the extra load. >=20 > The appropriate thing to do when adding a new package is to add only > keywords you can test and maintain (likely just ~amd64), and then file > a keyword request to ask arch teams to keyword the package if > appropriate, which leaves the choice to them. >=20 Ah, I see. In that case I'm in full agreement. We're taught during the mentoring/quizzing process that we don't keyword what we haven't tested. That's one of the most basic "rules". --=20 Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 --dGmm8pgNoAXpx0kKitbTiCCg3QHN5BObs-- --tngOS1B6cd5agCmWd0mLKJTwluwq5LLQE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXQAMaAAoJEAEkDpRQOeFwYxAP/09rA4erJeTYdU0wTqdKGX0B Ix+5/SHO85o8+NyRt7AnK93ApZ2UFx6DdFnpvKybK2sqKiRBcJjzoTkH4Sk6Bcne 9d4A+HkzfZpG5RmIris8xFCWR73CxDTyzANcxQ+hz4g0KxBeR8E/na6pRJU0UQtc 9oyK/bSd15VA0AE6nkH/1RQzUBbr4jvbrhxERk0alNAfIMtsh5m0O8OwHWDUADxL YOn10afElamRo/n2XyYuuUy9oxgY/RXE9K/lwRAyfjWGIZLdlHUz/kEpyW+1QHbN As9f8x+EGDXL9gDR9pUCs0eXdnywC35q2FnS8LeEGJNZlHZKYBSpRIVvzg6Oc/pz GEMqxu20JmKnGAQswMbJ4MHEoDOcB1wMRxSoyI9Yji6jz1Q5iQ4Pe6uZ8OBbpm1s VdYB6y9JWSKevaIyJ54uOOo7IRisHZC0DqkrbkqtozMgTCCB/6d4Fv4smpjPGjcO plaHvX2WZ2IF3F7zw9qK2qda7JJQ5E+KObO/dV9sLLtQn5V7dMUVujNAPRppsy6e 059OJZtDDJgSjtA73L6YW+Lj+dlw7JL6KDTZRbpD39qiHalx6NM8Kgr+/7jneo+v aA2sUhxO7RetLmdwSri0ffB+MVoe0qYz87TT/CbWLDVJvycUTSqTUBcIy+KiCk9i X3KcbgCYzxfGkdKGsOep =f4fy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tngOS1B6cd5agCmWd0mLKJTwluwq5LLQE--