From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345931396D0 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 975DE1FC1CE; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5305::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA321FC009 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:36:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1505749004; s=domk; d=akhuettel.de; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=iZUMYn4BN17gjtegtlYOXxYst3Bfg7MHPcmUWmTOxNc=; b=lLJj4HfDkrVqTITOOihCIEU5qkaKQyoRbx/GwhSxf9qQxnD39fuyoG3a0V22ecZdAz dkVpJFS5Wl0l29NSyi0FPlA4sN4GYdV8cXfLe3N8LpGJvYSoG8Ave3yINCLILWAg7o6U /jL0G2AFVzvJXto5hOIrjD88gdwP49fucGzrc= X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/p6KPKBAtzqF9HMbkIo= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (tmo-100-242.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.100.242]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 41.4 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id j09ac2t8IFah2FP (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:36:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.26 and changes with SunRPC, libtirpc, ntirpc, libnsl (NIS and friends), ... Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:36:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1560103.Vo3H48H2zC@porto> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: <9d70985f-b94d-29ea-6f9b-d17c2575ec23@iee.org> References: <1577962.20ZSkpDzGI@porto> <9d70985f-b94d-29ea-6f9b-d17c2575ec23@iee.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: 525d3b15-d691-49da-8f5b-8f6741f6e39e X-Archives-Hash: 1dde2f50f758fe81cdce83e22f06bc1d Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 14:28:37 CEST schrieb M. J. Everitt: > > >=20 > Would a virtual help any? Probably overlooking a good number of factors, > but wasn't mentioned yet ... >=20 So far I don't see how... Virtual would mean that the same functionality i= s=20 provided by different packages, and that they can be exchanged at runtime.= =20 However, for rpc there are different library *names* (sonames) to be linked= ,=20 and for nls the soversion is different... Even if the headers were identica= l,=20 that wouldnt work :/ =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)