From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04D213825A for ; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDB8914214; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA61021C063 for ; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localnet (oki-180-131-254-34.jptransit.net [180.131.254.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA18D3408B8 for ; Sun, 15 May 2016 00:24:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Bauman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 09:23:59 +0900 Message-ID: <1556568.JVTqaLWHPB@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/5.2.1 (Linux/4.5.3-gentoo; KDE/5.21.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160515004812.06969b6e@snowflex> References: <1462655928.66afcab271f65b97330e610040ad3acc1b812a03.hd_brummy@gentoo> <2471981.YXCVhQinPE@localhost> <20160515004812.06969b6e@snowflex> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2520704.7Xa3UzQQN2"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 20844771-587f-4289-8098-4d741da2e01e X-Archives-Hash: 689b66f988394e5acf2e13807df50458 --nextPart2520704.7Xa3UzQQN2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:48:12 AM JST Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2016 08:40:39 +0900 >=20 > Aaron Bauman wrote: > > Please enlighten me as to what was impolite here? The strong > > language of "seriously" or definitively stating that the individual > > did not perform the necessary QA actions before committing? Both of > > which are completely called for and appropriate. No vulgarity, > > insults, or demeaning words were used. How would you have responded > > professionally? >=20 > It's important to remember that Gentoo is run by volunteers. Expecting > a professional standard when it comes to the quality of commit > criticism is unfair. Applying that same rationale, it would be unfair to say that an undescribed= =20 level of professionalism in communication is required as well. Nothing her= e=20 violates the CoC. =2D-=20 Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E --nextPart2520704.7Xa3UzQQN2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJXN8GfXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1OTcyRDI4NDhFOEE0NDYwRTdERTY4QUM5 RjI4QkQ4QkQxRTM5NUZGAAoJEJ8ovYvR45X/sK4P/3UZa3FSVOHmlBxnHzuf24aI Mg10SvjChwvPkhEdNeuF3wMMPHpG8JzVdGYLf2Ji/6d8srsDmBf1vXfaa87jvs3C YlysttNVnTO6jxJR328M6Uo8zPLgn2rjsjHzAJZJKADY8xnSyvO6o8tYDhAkJMss cnOPCMPle0NzXXBxFB7p++jo1shOYkldsq3C4TRDzeJHn2ucvssxnrwOwYrASGIc p8XqEQAI7NYxEqbfef6o2+3rnd6jPrpJ4UWYDm1pg8ef8/Gwk/nOSoDO/Z72Ag3i OWv3T6hQxuG3qL3rDDyYEjbQJ8aqeAL5AI17pcqhLPCC720w1z+ERkEPp3JERrCE JXX/6yRYrx3OiG8TGQlqkcnaBLWk+tWGUIjhdOQO70xPVlFRVBgPah9IKXUs75Lq zi70jbn7ahBVXDvPKx1uGoCOGg/NgEPiO/wCNl85pyaZtpzho/ejKTbSY6j7Rykr 8MMaTUxrMChFq/ZfDkQs9t/2oBW/3NsKIbzqVtOeaF2Ii7MRD+HtO9qE19Z9ASAP +RUwBQWo0J+y0TikBvtPq8zVbmiYGF346WRlbUrjw1bZ2PnjOiL8XXbqlg+buxLG obNS6qTBnw4i2tp/v3rjiiOTQUeoffIp3nFuKRgOvNnJ/+gUfpQiZD2whwC+HmfT IDUusOl3WohlsxOOrJID =3lMC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2520704.7Xa3UzQQN2--