From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8011F138334 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5382E0AB2; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81782E0A8C for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BB4B335D26; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 20:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1538597432.942.7.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/share/doc From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 22:10:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1586501.4damBPEK4Y@tuxk10> References: <1df93cd0-b3e7-56cf-3a29-bfaed2069e02@gentoo.org> <545032b4-c3bc-d5cc-6d9e-02db4bdcfc51@gentoo.org> <1586501.4damBPEK4Y@tuxk10> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cCJk0gG1fZojGLTOAmvE" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 42415508-1e4d-4ff0-a37f-6cb1b5d1fb5a X-Archives-Hash: 333495f432a90b7d86a4608cf23aa718 --=-cCJk0gG1fZojGLTOAmvE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 20:29 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 20:26:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than > > ${PF}? >=20 > Because API does not change due to Gentoo revisions, and breaking/having = to=20 > rebuild docs for that is unacceptable. >=20 ...except when it does. We have valid cases for packages simultaneously installing different documentation for different PF but matching PV (e.g. slotted GTK+2 + GTK+3 packages). --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-cCJk0gG1fZojGLTOAmvE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEXr8g+Zb7PCLMb8pAur8dX/jIEQoFAlu1IjhfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDVF QkYyMEY5OTZGQjNDMjJDQzZGQ0E0MEJBQkYxRDVGRjhDODExMEEACgkQur8dX/jI EQo8WA//RAte9Bj70ovkdP9sdivpqAprYBR/MeMaVzZDfS0P0+g3p4Q/mmnWD+v0 7U7E9R6A3xf5lrRFmLL3Xe4kC4yl2sB40nSj1HzxQxOcX39IIodYBmq5jie2Mxny KkXXC/4Q+szEhDku7R37FjL0K/ESq7FHMTa03/BgJFkIDU4Um4GRIok4ju4+ixeY 1IzYfJrHOnDkCEitq61TsGlca2/ICX1W75/BwMIYPYn2A/00DIR8pEzSWJdQS7FU NTfbTq8gQF1oECI0s8ugYnOEguj/cK9RwFAlNxaUyiSsczoNBcjaApJoKYvSt0vQ CzAOBsRLl7h6xBtwe2IKIx6yXXwIs4u7BSO6aappQkJ/v7YrfwurIq9HLyPSbUE6 QF8Wpmq/Mdr0O/YlqWKJxLiv7sH0I6wS4Wa0XOLLQGTPd8qm7EhpZVXAsH/2doPo 7KtqK9JlBXznSFwd4qBvOBjLuvnVarNxdBsIwfQLGix8stR1HlE4yirzXDxX6BhE fd0QvtL7xkJ2IhqcFxUSxvdoI4PTUIo/jY68J2rNjxr5EZyal2EjQ4pgaIUZcl45 ROUb7aZ21O+kABRKBALGbJJVCiAPecDD+Y7s019N/cv0x5gM1rObQKqiT4fpTP8N J6PLqxb/Ha0rpQKPZhUYJ8e42td0jbQ0UbG4oW9KVe47OBo+gpY= =y/11 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cCJk0gG1fZojGLTOAmvE--