From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AAEF138334 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BD7DE0CAA; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420EEE0C89 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4286A335C2B; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1536865314.741.2.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cmake-utils.eclass: Make ninja default backend in EAPI >= 7 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 21:01:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2911463.GT03ohXffx@tuxbrain> References: <20180726063501.18702-1-soap@gentoo.org> <2911463.GT03ohXffx@tuxbrain> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CJQvd1+Fpo1NaSx4xifX" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: f5ee92ec-56a3-4440-a3cd-8e62438f72c6 X-Archives-Hash: 56597b493a34f864160fb50b4df9e000 --=-CJQvd1+Fpo1NaSx4xifX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 20:55 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 16:25:13 CEST Mike Gilbert wrote: > > This may effect your plans to enable ninja by default, since it will > > break any fortran package. >=20 > Not much concerned about that; backend default can be overridden by packa= ge,=20 > should its maintainer find out it breaks by EAPI-7 bump. >=20 ...and soon enough we end up tracking packages whose default backend needed to be changed because the maintainer had to workaround bugs in a particular ninja version. Am I the only one who misses the times when programmers made working software and tried to fix bugs rather than releasing whatever satisfies some internal use case, and ignoring bugs that didn't affect it? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-CJQvd1+Fpo1NaSx4xifX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEXr8g+Zb7PCLMb8pAur8dX/jIEQoFAluatCJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDVF QkYyMEY5OTZGQjNDMjJDQzZGQ0E0MEJBQkYxRDVGRjhDODExMEEACgkQur8dX/jI EQq4hg//Vf6EVqUnppgYetO7aJRPWw/pIN9uN/gVMGjlKeb5Cv1Etm4b50dwpfr1 Vtqi6L3ufShWFhKp7citv8TeGSpVDJPLYW1hMv6/QlKwlVp99ucuDJyo0C+5+sJf 2kuNXG6te4zTxhveAdApgEKx8xRfEMPS7qlveZg+5MQiwmgjXKRJTgJs0QSQprNB jBrFfWusD2XOs8u1b+iWr90GJM8tJCVRLzcqkk3+HHbzq7Q0myjZa9rUAt9NL658 gOCy3QmP/HgVXzam1LyOLbzIMlsgRDhQNNF3zLpt7rOzIihVG8UONQjqbivbBhfs 83D6+2yA2Q23/9yKiPeACpaTibTEBpl/UQRYsQcY45jHxzWlkzsvvq1Aym7BXVY5 vdqdAKKJuzaRnZc/lA+P8vIqOMyiCerBH6mnPErUzP0ubaEOD4ZX1I3QtLk/u+Fz gjxnSyk4ohh2nYeMrvmwg525zgXh5g3c4hJMrPehxUrhpf0Ha/aqbWgbDS9uvsul JXr4uiZ121bG+yUiK6Vjaxx/73ogDy6txGavNWiJsFAuO9Ez4qylk7M/cuvFjQD4 xm0SsFyAQdmAulyofWAwHQTI2ga58ROq1R1zhOB8UzRGuLgVaf5KYaCNmJvHaD3T HqU+/Z0U1WkgfExpXUyFopC0GU62haYV29wN0pxbk3NiwQVQoX0= =sAKT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CJQvd1+Fpo1NaSx4xifX--