From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10282138334 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DA7AE08DD; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425F6E0893 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.51] (62.65.228.137.cable.starman.ee [62.65.228.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leio) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2591D335C39; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1535307274.4490.18.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Solving the problem of huge number of wrong LICENSES=*GPL-[23] From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: licenses@gentoo.org, qa Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:14:34 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1535303675.1066.32.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1535279962.1066.24.camel@gentoo.org> <1535303675.1066.32.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qjbk9UX0DG2wICFP/ZmK" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 5829469e-8b88-496f-aa59-f497726a63f9 X-Archives-Hash: d17ce23c160e41ff836775e0a8a22da5 --=-qjbk9UX0DG2wICFP/ZmK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C3=9Chel kenal p=C3=A4eval, P, 26.08.2018 kell 19:14, kirjutas Micha=C5=82= G=C3=B3rny: > One thing where this would fail would be e.g.: >=20 > LICENSE=3D"GPL-2+ > bar? ( GPL-2 ) > foo? ( GPL-3+ )" ^ you can't put a comment on the right line LICENSE=3D"GPL-2+ " LICENSE+=3D"bar? ( GPL-2 ) " # GPL-2 only LICENSE+=3D"foo? ( GPL-3+ )" --=-qjbk9UX0DG2wICFP/ZmK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEUdZn9pOq0mlNjRvdEKbJ+k9JlgYFAluC7gpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDUx RDY2N0Y2OTNBQUQyNjk0RDhEMUJERDEwQTZDOUZBNEY0OTk2MDYACgkQEKbJ+k9J lgYdPA/+M+icdHC4qoiq7RWBm8swaByQnfx9OzUn9IfZ/isp3b87SHecR6CzHXEs Vf1SvOyMF9o4rQwknI6Z+IzGV6L4AZuTPKy4/0RR+K3dvlIGAVq435joLi/hwJOs BBF3UXVpB4y9pYW1qGPLdhQvjj517ZDAImAZRsqMZ2VGHpyvXPrOQGXCGLV10Tq6 EbLpRIUnGg7hc3flBUFc1lAzKpOAes45yMLgphRhRt0h1qiBbndwgS7uJxBWw8hX /9cWS7HLQl9nAILzPRB+Ar/BVmeEYGZqf6btfgtTFSQSQx6qlU0LItGOx+2tzoo0 rHr/gTRzXUXA1GV9HHBoh7quue3WMhXxwEmXYzWwRlNC1ncCByu1f6PGrt5Wc4mM uIxWBTlPwc/HqnqvxnetDojKFfuvuQYD1aOKEjrCiAaRNCMgBqfLJx5FG3t5m3H/ 7hgi2XLYFzN0aCLuiI+buJTpsnOifkDYFHNWE44zKwOAt6HaNcLOONyKXalgQHnn rFr/EBOTf/Ty8SQlLyjdJ1ShrihJeSHwSKIn+4uB5BPxlKbqrX6ewRNOHEfm3Pna 7rE/241YAr9sUSC6xPc1xv0Y8sjwpPMGKwNaeTYxv0UqSzfLeIGuNZW+u1OCxLYI +TuPe9LgvJ270HfSDXujhd160VMQdOLPRgDu9eW939QJw4gOspo= =Kk9/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qjbk9UX0DG2wICFP/ZmK--