From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3CAC138334 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ADD0E08E5; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EA0E08C4 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2062F335CA7; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1531377261.960.4.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:34:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1531125622.1159.11.camel@gentoo.org> <1531132159.7067.5.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CFPlbkF1juOWmZ8izcb2" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: a11e497e-5751-4ebb-9323-2a7f1e38eddb X-Archives-Hash: 646e1c8410e358645be9c69828c23275 --=-CFPlbkF1juOWmZ8izcb2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable W dniu wto, 10.07.2018 o godzinie 09=E2=88=B638=E2=80=89-0400, u=C5=BCytkow= nik kuzetsa napisa=C5=82: > > The only issue I see is that of slight complications on handling the > > different addresses for author and commit, that's all that comes to > > mind. > >=20 > >=20 > > Mart > >=20 >=20 > I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart. >=20 > Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses > which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue, > so this policy change shouldn't affect proxy-maint? >=20 For the record, dev-timeline accounts for both authors and committers.=20 However, it only displays those who have been Gentoo developers at some point (and whose alternate e-mail addresses are in LDAP). --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-CFPlbkF1juOWmZ8izcb2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEbbsHzE8NrQbqCv5BsHoa6u+0Rk4FAltG9m1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDZE QkIwN0NDNEYwREFEMDZFQTBBRkU0MUIwN0ExQUVBRUZCNDQ2NEUACgkQsHoa6u+0 Rk62ExAAshz37+tQ8Bpurv1jLI7JI3iGONyQy47UtztdIF9mlqHJHuMZNclPUW4O V65gVep0nUqmTmSrbBiwStq3QXAl1qPO0Ul6xZov1Q9+PWg3uLu155nh2iXT9yrf PG5ExsRSA7cmvfGBpxbr2YZ28lNuCJIERp3Lqci+pRAFNXivAVsd0TugOu1YQG/I INd/+ggeX5nyfGUB6UKlCPDrIMHSZbNKoVgUtVcnvMHI+TceYYoq+aXMMtDvie62 5LvoS06CBKj6Yef6gvlGfVnfbDrRG1RfUH/iZZMA3z+5s4RCz1ecw4Wl/9zWIW9P CbRIsPFHPitesjn2Miwo2tM/GyhRtk0/fDzhPUmr3XAVaXDHPh4/yco7tHbvmshf IsYATGr8D81hJn3IFUxD15TGZ0uHLAoDOu7+4WqCBZj4hFnvuLdlSPlD1FyIY1Ou riTHvN41A/Xb5cIhDNpyGBR9zBVbNZSeDIZBQ06ZU8XMgl4Kt4PE4mWJ7KRUAGtk lUHeYLC07GKYVEY4ksK3fZ3EFyo9UjFZ2BylpV/3K3Gj8WoDPYFvaxoWCFpVNJ4Y gZHM23cRDlB7ZjWf1ksX8oyBEMP/pWlM4PiybAPPosNUgtiBAyD8PyJHyo9S+7tZ JhRHcVWBM9ac0UlEwxxSRSSQiIJcM4RLFpbJFhtfnjCv5ytKfHQ= =kzrw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CFPlbkF1juOWmZ8izcb2--