From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E5F1382C5 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DDD4E098E; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD260E0969 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 511C1335C06; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1522101480.23621.8.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eclass: freedict: require EAPI=6 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: "Marty E. Plummer" Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 23:58:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180326213310.4507-1-hanetzer@startmail.com> References: <20180326213310.4507-1-hanetzer@startmail.com> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 714c338f-5189-4272-9cb7-f82dfb94ed22 X-Archives-Hash: 1dbcbbf53be9c6545c019c8fc4519aff W dniu pon, 26.03.2018 o godzinie 16∶33 -0500, użytkownik Marty E. Plummer napisał: > As a pretty simple eclass, which only inherited multilib in > order to get $(get_libdir) and eutils for who knows why, and > all its consumers bumped to EAPI=6, it makes sense to require > EAPI 6 for this eclass > It's trivial, used by 6 ebuilds... why do we even have this eclass? If I wrote mgorny.eclass it would have more consumers ;-P. -- Best regards, Michał Górny