From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970E115808B for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221342BC00D; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389092BC005 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <15220c96694b6a0f37864652b9432478ec9f75e8.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 09:48:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 7afb46cd-9960-4040-aefe-a3781494adb0 X-Archives-Hash: 59f6e84a3af81965be3a0d361075a67b On Sat, 2022-03-19 at 08:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022, Zoltan Puskas wrote: > > [Please don't top-post.] > > > I've been using both repoman _and_ pkgcheck becasue I was not sure > > which > > one covers all the checks I need to make. In fact [Pull Requests > > wiki](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:GitHub/Pull_requests) has > > a > > big red warning box with the following message, and I quote: > > > "CI is not an excuse not to run repoman full, at least for the > > packages > > being committed." > > That warning box also says: "Furthermore, pkgcheck is imperfect (yet > very fast) and may fail to notice some subtle breakages (especially if > USE flag masking/forcing) is involved." > > Looks like the warning was added by mgorny in 2016 [1]. Have these > issues with pkgcheck been fixed in the meantime? Yes, I think all the blockers were fixed since. -- Best regards, Michał Górny