From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC661382C5 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2733EE08F7; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B8BE08F2 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66147335C43; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1519202246.1151.4.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add element to metadata.xml From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:37:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1519192579.6488.1.camel@gentoo.org> References: <20180220215837.18255-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <1519192579.6488.1.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 69005272-f7cf-4bb6-a6d4-62dc60537bcf X-Archives-Hash: 1f6d0c677e7f6431c8512c5ec84712db W dniu śro, 21.02.2018 o godzinie 07∶56 +0200, użytkownik Mart Raudsepp napisał: > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 22:58 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ element can contain, in any order: > > languages (at most one for each language), as detailed > > in `Slot descriptions`_. > > > > +- zero or more ```` elements, possibly > > restricted > > + to specific package versions (at most one for each version) whose > > presence > > + indicates that the appropriate ebuilds are suitable for ALLARCHES > > + stabilization. > > + > > ALLARCHES is a bugzilla keyword that happened to get referred to as > such for the action as well, in all its yelling glory. > I would prefer the action itself defined here, not refer to some > bugzilla keyword that lacks any reference citation and is known mainly > just from moderate maintainer experience or googling. > v2 sent with more verbose explanation. -- Best regards, Michał Górny