Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Split distfile mirror directory structure

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

W dniu nie, 28.01.2018 o godzinie 11∶22 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > This specification currently defines one section: ``[structure]``.
> > > > This section defines one or more repository structure definitions
> > > > using sequential integer keys.  The definition keyed as ``0``
> > > > is the most preferred structure.  The package manager should use
> > > > the first structure format it recognizes as supported, and ignore any
> > > > it does not recognize.  If this section is not present, the package
> > > > manager should behave as if only ``flat`` structure were supported.
> > > 
> > > It is not at all clear from this how integer keys are ordered. The
> > > paragraph only says that "0" is most preferred, but says nothing about
> > > comparison of other numbers.
> > > 
> > > For example, if there are keys "-1", "0", and "1" (these are
> > > "sequential integer keys", right?), what is their order of preference?
> > Please suggest a better wording. The idea was to use 0=, 1=, 2=...
> 
> "... using non-negative integer keys.  The definition with the
> smallest key is the most preferred structure.  The package manager
> should ignore any formats it does not recognize."
> 
> Ulrich

How about this then:

| This specification currently defines one section: ``[structure]``.
| This section defines one or more repository structure definitions
| using non-negative sequential integer keys.  The definition with
| the ``0`` key is the most preferred structure.  The package manager
| should ignore any formats it does not recognize.  If this section
| is not present, the package manager should behave as if only ``flat``
| structure were specified.

I don't want people to skip numbers, and I want to avoid confusion
between 0/1 as initial number.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny