From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725FD1382C5 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B3CEE0A64; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2286E0A4F for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0493335C31; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1516712239.23875.2.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:57:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180123120049.GA994@gentoo.org> References: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> <1516708002.23875.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20180123120049.GA994@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: e41c407a-933a-4fb4-8e22-ee5aae63fd54 X-Archives-Hash: eebc63e04673f1efdd595e73910f9737 W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 13∶23 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen napisał: > On 23-01-2018 12:49:00 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny <[1]mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not > > > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists > > > in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer. > > > > Not sure having two lists in Bugzilla would be an improvement. It would be nice > > if more people expressed a preference, though! > > I like the "popularity" order, but on top of that, I'd like to group > 32/64 bits versions of arches. Basically djc converted into: > > AMD64 > X86 > PPC64 > PPC > ARM64 > ARM > SPARC64 (?) > SPARC > ALPHA > IA64 > HPPA > MIPS > ... > Included your version on the page. I've also reordered amd64-fbsd before x86-fbsd to match. -- Best regards, Michał Górny