From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39BD71382C5 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C732BE0995; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F0BE095E for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AFD9335C0C; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1516708002.23875.1.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:46:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1516053701.952.9.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c94da522-2b55-4579-a5b2-85c8aa651218 X-Archives-Hash: ffeea3a667e7511fc9b0fdea77537d47 W dniu pon, 15.01.2018 o godzinie 23∶01 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan. All arches are order according to the popularity (based on the results from his mail), except Prefix which I left at the bottom as a special case. Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer. -- Best regards, Michał Górny