From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9511396D9 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B93E2BC066; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EABCEE0BDF for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B191933BEC7; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1508569765.844.0.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 hashes, take n+1-th From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:09:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1508440120.19870.14.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c1eb0574-17de-4f89-a2df-dc46c476ee24 X-Archives-Hash: 3df810c7f0ea58dbb784f4dc78802cac W dniu sob, 21.10.2017 o godzinie 04∶01 +0200, użytkownik Jason A. Donenfeld napisał: > Blake2 is in coreutils already, provides an excellent security margin, and > is considerably faster than both sha2 and sha3. > Yes, we've already switched the proposal to BLAKE2B. Although it is only faster if you use a good implementation. The silly implementation in Python is slower than SHA2. -- Best regards, Michał Górny