From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:33:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506025998.3293.1.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506023769.15165.14.camel@gentoo.org>
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 21.09.2017 kell 21:56, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> TL;DR: I'm looking for new people to resume work on sandbox, and I
> will
> most likely branch it at v2.10 and start keep-alive work on top of
> that.
>
>
> The state of our sandbox is not very well. Gentoo is currently using
> the old v2.10 with local patches. v2.11 is p.masked for a long time
> because of multiple unsolved bugs. The git repository also includes
> v2.12 tag that has not even been packaged for Gentoo. From what I've
> been able to establish, the bugs causing v2.11 mask are still present
> in git head.
>
> To add to this, the only person maintaining the code (vapier) has not
> touched it since March, and AFAIA he's not responding to any contact
> attempts from within Gentoo. Given this and the importance of sandbox
> to
> Gentoo at the moment, I think it's reasonable to presume he's MIA
> and start looking for volunteers to join the effort.
>
> I have already added myself to the project page [1] and I'm going to
> try
> to put some effort into improving the state of things. However, I'm
> not
> really an expert in the high magic used in sandbox. If anyone is
> interested in helping out, feel free to add yourself as well.
>
>
> The above considered, I don't think I'm really going to be able to
> solve
> the problems introduced by v2.11. If nobody has a better idea, I'm
> going
> to branch sandbox at v2.10 and look into backporting whatever's
> feasible
> and resuming development in hotfix mode on top of that.
Do you have a handy list of problems with v2.11?
Perhaps all is well for Gentoo usages after the more ptrace-happy
fallbacking commit (apparently was needed by ChromeOS) is reverted if
ptrace-path problems don't get fixes?
Mart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 19:56 [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project Michał Górny
2017-09-21 20:33 ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2017-09-21 20:54 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-21 21:07 ` Mart Raudsepp
2017-09-21 21:25 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-21 22:41 ` Matt Turner
2017-09-22 4:07 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-22 10:57 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-09-22 11:38 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2017-09-22 12:04 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-09-22 12:27 ` Rich Freeman
2017-09-22 15:06 ` James McMechan
2017-09-22 17:03 ` Brian Dolbec
2017-09-22 17:16 ` Patrick McLean
2017-09-22 15:20 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-22 17:15 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-09-22 17:39 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-22 18:31 ` Alexis Ballier
2017-09-22 21:26 ` Michał Górny
2017-09-21 21:28 ` Patrick McLean
2017-09-22 21:51 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-22 22:01 ` Michael Orlitzky
2017-09-22 22:05 ` Alec Warner
2017-09-23 5:18 ` R0b0t1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506025998.3293.1.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=leio@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox