From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42AE139694 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FB981FC08D; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256B41FC006 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.51] (85.253.85.107.cable.starman.ee [85.253.85.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leio) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81BF634196A for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1501859326.2526.9.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-boot/plymouth needs major fixes/maintainer From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 18:08:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170804164312.441cdf42@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec> References: <1501062999.4544.105.camel@gentoo.org> <1501856225.2526.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1501857435.2526.5.camel@gentoo.org> <20170804164312.441cdf42@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 894b364c-c44d-4238-b6db-61e2c8a15203 X-Archives-Hash: 670943e96f4fcaa37a96f56603c8dda7 On R, 2017-08-04 at 16:43 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:37:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > On R, 2017-08-04 at 14:23 +0000, Lucas Ramage wrote: > > > I am looking into this for openrc. I copied it over to my > > > personal > > > overlay. > > > > Ok, how about I mark myself as maintainer then and add you as co > > -maintainer for OpenRC aspects, and you can e-mail me fixes for > > openrc > > or otherwise? > > Last time I checked, plymouth-0.9.x had a hard requirement for > systemd > to work. From what I remember, making 0.9.x versions work with openrc > might become a hard to solve task. > If Lucas concludes that, I guess he could maintain a restored 0.8.x, while there's 0.9.x systemd version maintained by me and hopefully others (help still welcome, I'm still waiting on bug 613222, but might be able to convert another machine earlier to plymouth). Personally I've always connected plymouth with systemd and I'm surprised some open OpenRC bugs were triggering treecleaning, but yes, having a maintainer is always good as there are some service bug open too, but so it is for the countless other maintainer-needed packages we have around. Mart