From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF76139694 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E1961FC054; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47A91FC04B for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (85.253.85.107.cable.starman.ee [85.253.85.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leio) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 052A2341A8A for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1501346499.14393.3.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 19:41:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: <509ce16c-bd75-83f2-9c58-802c0b01ac77@gentoo.org> References: <20170724222223.6d359e47@sf> <20170724232244.GT12397@stuge.se> <1931696.H1tAJ0QB7a@porto> <509ce16c-bd75-83f2-9c58-802c0b01ac77@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 719b5ed5-e073-4430-aeb3-1790dc5f90f9 X-Archives-Hash: 576e615ff6695e7b18a47675a059cd21 > why take away the stable choice? I think it is rather clear that stable keywords aren't going anywhere for architectures like amd64. I suggest we drop all of the subthreads on this topic and get back to other interesting thoughts (which may include dropping stable for some other arches of course; I mean doing it for all doesn't deserve e-mails imo). Mart