From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A43139694 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 838941FC008; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366501FC002 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8918534178B; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1501016118.16994.2.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:55:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <95f20815-a73e-06d8-d528-37be9e7602a1@gentoo.org> References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> <5a155985-1ce4-9872-0259-b67520d9a867@gentoo.org> <1500988986.795.5.camel@gentoo.org> <95f20815-a73e-06d8-d528-37be9e7602a1@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Pu8MjzjScqOnfYRCnpdP" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 000aaf5e-4abf-461a-b0c9-fc2a9017b4f8 X-Archives-Hash: 13a625c411523e131013c76860ec1956 --=-Pu8MjzjScqOnfYRCnpdP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On wto, 2017-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 07/25/2017 04:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >=20 > > I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case. > > One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users. > >=20 > > If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so. > >=20 >=20 > Can I also delete packages and break the tree so long as I put > everything back before I push? That is not the same, and you know that. Plus, there's a major difference between not doing unnecessary work and purposely doing something awful just to prove a point. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-Pu8MjzjScqOnfYRCnpdP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKmBAABCgCQFiEEbbsHzE8NrQbqCv5BsHoa6u+0Rk4FAll3sDZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDZE QkIwN0NDNEYwREFEMDZFQTBBRkU0MUIwN0ExQUVBRUZCNDQ2NEUSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJELB6GurvtEZOdiEQAJZE1mq0ju3Cws2Pr348lcYl/Mq2Ufky R3vKcfE3u7vuw+p+pWqUz/fvExKMfjqGnCx5lcEtUvoLY7WSJNd2x0PUc7Sxjd4E IGiw6jltSgSHa73t1oKbVAlnDBAs1DSCit6qMpChDeIjzxTNnDodQpqc+ryZFbiq 6S+1QD6wGnHvr06PWR9qHlszCf+SiEfzddEzqIRwGihrcEBk2BlINORC7R7Pibb8 3nwhzGcswb5O69KC+RFwNwiVG5ZrpbALnOysVE3prP4EzKW4zt35JwP1fFtEe8x7 uWSm0KhMjkFxpl+xUusJpQBUQziAQ6aGBIX7XxLJj/fos9mO4ZdXR6jzPXiaXcik uGqaicEmT2unWw52fJ0U3mkl/kswDH8zvC3Kjw6IaWbsN+/nLJRvp30zx/AIfZdj 7es8TpGb4DsldOTdL6LWMmSz5BcSdKtsuBAuZyCouU7brzg2bKkUYJSNf8gfZFU4 YFcebq9mGd/8gHrAfPSGyIPo9qgC2o5B+61v9p9uaD0JoJn2S8M+e8Rgm72UeXuU PXnoRxZmhcqY2ciRbqLYmdOvrzU4TxRFSkeHPtQ20cdUsgMAT1uNtMH280fcP4cr L8oGVebc6bndKB0XnEI8KP7mcdDuPxcKl3O/AJLEym7uQ7Z1/ZAaYXBdTjAkZ3oO T4PsZo3di8HF =z2dW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Pu8MjzjScqOnfYRCnpdP--