On wto, 2017-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 04:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > 
> > I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case.
> > One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users.
> > 
> > If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so.
> > 
> 
> Can I also delete packages and break the tree so long as I put
> everything back before I push?

That is not the same, and you know that. Plus, there's a major
difference between not doing unnecessary work and purposely doing
something awful just to prove a point.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny