From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9ABE139694 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE6621FC05D; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F30C1FC007 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6F5A3417D5; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1500990510.795.12.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Michael Orlitzky Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:48:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UOgnhzKf4ZeCrvO0geSz" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 903cdc9c-84a7-4675-b46a-409fcd9fbfa8 X-Archives-Hash: 3f9c48fc08ab340b17f93454f916a214 --=-UOgnhzKf4ZeCrvO0geSz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On wto, 2017-07-25 at 09:26 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >=20 > > Except that there is no machines using it. In all contexts, using full = URL for machine readability is better as it works with all software out of = the box. > >=20 >=20 > Until the domain name of the bugzilla server changes/etc. Even if we > migrated all the old bugs the URLs would break. That might be an > argument for not having a full URL. This is a very stupid argument. If we ever break bug URLs, commit messages are the *least* of our concerns. > There would also be less variation. Bug: 123456 is pretty unambiguous > as a reference. When you start having http vs https and maybe a few > different ways of creating a URL to a bug it could get messier. Except that 123456 could refer to any bugtracker anywhere. No reasonable tool will do anything with that number since it's ambiguous by definition. And if I were to use stupid arguments, then I should point out if we ever have a review platform, then the numbers would suddenly become ambiguous -- is it Bugzilla or the review platform? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-UOgnhzKf4ZeCrvO0geSz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKmBAABCgCQFiEEbbsHzE8NrQbqCv5BsHoa6u+0Rk4FAll3TC5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDZE QkIwN0NDNEYwREFEMDZFQTBBRkU0MUIwN0ExQUVBRUZCNDQ2NEUSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJELB6GurvtEZO+J8P/j0BwlDfnE0ZrJ/VQzMrBittuNbxRYSK Wx9Q+Oy7wZ3NNI4Bv/2927lreM5OLT6UaxCHxxGAvvCBMrJ/YqDBSMy+Lz6V3Rvp EmjW+YtTifeWKIRCxVX7/qlUTzfzYLUTw5H+kbKjgcoiAygXKPI/5uv0F+iTxdVs 1Y9rRNFvwucbP3UtmPXubhZvlbx1oJW98i/2ErB/zV8owVNTq3CyF2Zm54bgQtRq 824P4DxGJJfzRsGIhcgPtoe59W6rY3dnXNGZwsKbEafy/SClWrBh1oyUyXAD9P3i 4oMv8k+cFcjaaWK24o2tk74YLvD1eapa2PsDKdqUZU58WB4tYWg/qJW/TT3bHLVz tkDJ1arv1+iiT3oH9nSUf9X7RSIlKuJEGi2Eyz7HF+T7WS+lFacK172unedFk8+b zllv3Jwy+xv20CXoM9VI7bgtT+SHScnuvdHQBXX3Attr7ZBeVZ7EZqw1bKjexxR0 qE5UTcWK54LVdReM+H4hvnG8vzWTx7MMsZGGjBoK2Dq4jJwlJFVL+xD2MESZpTXQ jokZP8WeSJajVAfdJodjYoAeMzOQ7p+jTK/dN3gEmdxsUJwR5Xxp4qIZBIzTuNLN nxKfiCGZyliX+4zz9q/sphdhBrr3hUbOXfDz6qdN/hyR2ctV/gUo6CcehrDMHNt5 jJMMle9Zmjn+ =9ttr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UOgnhzKf4ZeCrvO0geSz--