From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC18C139694 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7FB1E0C9A; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6807AE0BEC for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:980:4ed9:1:beae:c5ff:fe48:18dc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:980:4ed9:1:beae:c5ff:fe48:18dc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graaff) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E623417F6 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1500963971.25461.7.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? From: Hans de Graaff To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:26:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20170724222223.6d359e47@sf> <20170724232244.GT12397@stuge.se> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-byn9LCEqNEhEUd0J1Ijg" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: df8b3f18-811a-4381-a866-7969b6d1a135 X-Archives-Hash: a309025d25f7c5b4e613f48670c3efcb --=-byn9LCEqNEhEUd0J1Ijg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 04:34 +0000, Duncan wrote: >=20 > Automating stabilization and automated keyword dropping on timeouts > seems=C2=A0 > the only other practical choice, as unfortunately, "stale" is what > we=C2=A0 > have today in practice, if not in name. Looking at https://repology.org/statistics stable isn't quite that stale compared to other distributions. We're not doing great either, so we should certainly try to improve. Hans --=-byn9LCEqNEhEUd0J1Ijg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABEIAB0WIQSx3yP+V82AqODatGmIg/pWowio1wUCWXbkgwAKCRCIg/pWowio 11oDAP9o4aIxWVzRAsjPSdRrub0hiNf0sBK8jGnJZtTycpKAuAD/a+0o18ovv5P2 WULJYDmXP8g3ano5s01COM1u3HjLZZU= =65Uu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-byn9LCEqNEhEUd0J1Ijg--