From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37856139694 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A84921C09B; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21D1E21C08D for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E3DE341866; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1497459605.32080.0.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new category, app-containers From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:00:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170614160857.GA29303@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> References: <20170614160857.GA29303@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-F4JjYmteAlCb7atHa5E7" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 21ea5f4d-521f-4350-840f-6337b910c52d X-Archives-Hash: 65254bde713f9460b606f968947d0914 --=-F4JjYmteAlCb7atHa5E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On =C5=9Bro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > All, >=20 > I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for > container-related utilities. >=20 > Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or > app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be my first choice. >=20 > Is it time to start thinking about an app-containers category? > If so, is it ok for me to start an app-containers category with these > packages then we can look into moving other packages to it? >=20 You don't create a new category for two packages. Do you have more use cases for it? I think usually people provide a fair number of existing packages that are in different categories to prove the necessity of a new category. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-F4JjYmteAlCb7atHa5E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKmBAABCgCQFiEEbbsHzE8NrQbqCv5BsHoa6u+0Rk4FAllBa5ZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDZE QkIwN0NDNEYwREFEMDZFQTBBRkU0MUIwN0ExQUVBRUZCNDQ2NEUSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJELB6GurvtEZO7sMP/0daraWpxQrNBi32eaIGO3Hd2XkDs1pJ NTq1fr2SohlMghXuQ7kfaaoRVD1Rl9aXQbhHTXAbrFIAeNV/RPDpzAKB7n9o6kbV WCnrWIZOtyPvMrF2eYT4FuoV3hCRgs+84lWaNytPjaVmLHg9mvSyScd2LWRuroFx HF1qI+N00Cw61o7P8mytXOSdnK+CjwOW8lybM2ATXJDqxYBuNk0+GF817sWRXLuj Z9nqYkEdRYAsPDqciDJ2jWPbIUReKoLhd/wB6kQQECd9W4vyNG/Y06W5Qae7VyjO bE4uQSqRvIZ3tRSBeOCebNo6OVsdjO1wravw5eN6XvoVDik9N1q0ujbk875wCfPi eZDw0dy8MsZq1sDQFiOPzlidTIuGDslsyojqRQLlik5El+72nwWddeDSvE8SYcRb oDyIDAPxoA0Pzkp7ywoiB0tups4hFdcE2dogP5IIvnsvpOdGIlPyr83royn+HorM iqxYIuirD5AH7cg8TIoxTIjeqSswIVJoRqdht/t/mHcj04ZDAHfboUN3t4jKQF8B sm5KvUsbLAVubJqHsBYbiAXviPT/dofgpEqQsjqgJEMHlkalwGQcm7UpMMLUe/JZ Sy41bSUCpkx3TupOcT+Snc9HlDBnqe2akVgPSBmuu2PfyJueknSm2PxMzFbhkV0e k8U+rCe1Jt8w =pOAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-F4JjYmteAlCb7atHa5E7--