From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0C9139694 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AC3C21C1AC; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC6321C0A6 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.21] (85.253.87.190.cable.starman.ee [85.253.87.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leio) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5E3134185E for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1497197692.24558.5.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass: automatically move configure.in to configure.ac From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:14:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170611161242.GA28799@linux1> References: <20170610132819.736131ca@wim.jer> <20170610130406.35cf203a@sf> <20170611150029.GA28495@linux1> <1497193653.24558.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1497194671.30990.8.camel@gentoo.org> <3d6c816c-5f3b-5349-0f96-32a0d354b504@gentoo.org> <20170611161242.GA28799@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 96540946-0669-4b7f-9941-4edd34e19974 X-Archives-Hash: 78cce9945bec5fa8dbc98ccc4a20f0fd Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.06.2017 kell 11:12, kirjutas William Hubbs: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 05:35:53PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: > > On 06/11/2017 05:24 PM, David Seifert wrote: > > > > We can always patch the eclass at that point if that is still a > > > > big > > > > concern, but I fundamentally agree with William on this, > > > > starting > > > > point > > > > should be fixing it upstream, so can start with a tracking bug > > > > on > > > > affected packages. > > > > > > > > > > Here's a deal: you can start filing + fixing them. > > > > > > > The [tracker] is already started, it was determined to add QA > > warning > > with info on filing upstream bugs in [bug 426262] and the proper > > solution is again iterated in [bug 546614], so its not like this is > > a > > new approach that is being suggested, but sure, we should all file > > bugs > > when we encounter them. > > > > References: > > [tracker] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530632 > > > > [bug 426262] > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262 > > > > [bug 546614] > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546614 > > It seems that the proper fix to this, even for a package that won't > do > the fix upstream is to use WANT_AUTOCONF in the ebuild to force the > version of autoconf you need. No. It appears you don't know how WANT_AUTOCONF works.