From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E03C139694 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C90721C093; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1824621C06A for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thinkpad.fritz.box (cable-static-236-115.teleport.ch [213.188.236.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: soap) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EB80341820 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1497194671.30990.8.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass: automatically move configure.in to configure.ac From: David Seifert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:24:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20170610132819.736131ca@wim.jer> <20170610130406.35cf203a@sf> <20170611150029.GA28495@linux1> <1497193653.24558.2.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 1ae48454-d3ab-4a31-a633-5eae5564ad46 X-Archives-Hash: 59e713b2015050168c9175eb43e32b03 On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 17:12 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/11/2017 05:07 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.06.2017 kell 10:00, kirjutas William > > Hubbs: > > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:04:06PM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:28:19 +0200 > > > > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262 > > > > > + mv configure.{in,ac} || die > > > > > > > > Looks good. > > > > > > > > --  > > > > > > > >   Sergei > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > I think this should be handled by the packages, not at the eclass > > > level. > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262#c3 > > > > > > The packages should either mv the configure.in to configure.ac > > > internally, or better yet, the maintainers should ask upstream > > > for > > > their > > > packages to fix it. > > > > +1, otherwise we will never be able to add/unmask a newer autoconf > > that > > doesn't look at configure.in anymore, once such a version > > eventually > > happens. > > > > We can always patch the eclass at that point if that is still a big > concern, but I fundamentally agree with William on this, starting > point > should be fixing it upstream, so can start with a tracking bug on > affected packages. > Here's a deal: you can start filing + fixing them. David