From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF1B139694 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 05:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B1C2E0BF3; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCF5E0BB3 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2A13341700; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1496379586.1537.0.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: vim@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:59:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2441749.gsc6QkMBCV@note> References: <15162118.1WtZIBpG5a@note> <2441749.gsc6QkMBCV@note> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-IcVfIKVxaX/0vR3qpmhV" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: dd2603e9-634c-4420-86eb-c28529fb402d X-Archives-Hash: 0821b3a6dbf65941507b7f9b99d8f68b --=-IcVfIKVxaX/0vR3qpmhV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On pi=C4=85, 2017-06-02 at 04:56 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? >=20 > 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-= php- > like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled = by=20 > neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules f= or=20 > each of vim they want) from Ciaran's suggestion of making a directory com= mon=20 > for all vims, patch all the vims, and force *developers* to check modules= and=20 > put them there only after check modules under both (currently) vims (as s= ide=20 > effect leave neovim users without modules until developers finaly finish = that=20 > work). >=20 > And what point they (participants) really supports? Just FYI, I'm strongly against eselect modules (and any user code) that writes into /usr (except for /usr/local). This directory should be reserved for package manager control, and files in it should be registered in vdb. >=20 > 3) Again, dear Vim Team, please come here, and take a part in the discuss= ion. >=20 --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-IcVfIKVxaX/0vR3qpmhV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKmBAABCgCQFiEEbbsHzE8NrQbqCv5BsHoa6u+0Rk4FAlkw8MJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDZE QkIwN0NDNEYwREFEMDZFQTBBRkU0MUIwN0ExQUVBRUZCNDQ2NEUSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJELB6GurvtEZO+ggQAIGNzxAE53AHKWoLdBjWBf+YB8QXPzMc 7eAKe8itDrGc4/sb88mFFoS/Pgwvh3CWsh5L0rzp9d9kml/efZKBKoQPu9c4HdXz 9xmUcwMo0mOEZaJMSMBhDTFE0+hgUOoxABG55YodCgal6VzuNAeQFGBkjnBVGo/g yXeE3fRDX0XpIKXbL55OPZswyv93AW+fEDOJ+b5ycwpN9TYv3qAouU1+fZrppoGe I8sCl1o1Q3PT4yl2OiCoF4safE+Qe278ATQuNFuUwRLZ6MSy8RDQEiA1XBbLaOI7 c1/4UeV3wfes35zS2q47Sj+93UqTxHOpmsVJ9JcqZo9zWjUzJ4y+LVvAfVkaYkrO f1LTzcBw7yZKZqrJkSGnrP/1SlNcAkT1GPyjCwH3bKniZdnQr2XbUcoWA6rUPE2p 2BTGoxaHLVOHVtwvHzVj4YFKtJw5PLFWs3BKChurG8LdNb7gDdnZTauazhyX3Qii 5oo9MpbCvuSgCeZ1H55kQiLaf1p1YlFEK1fxbG3h32SUIK+L1jaAx8V7Yuib4r6m 4dpHF3CIWe9jIzwVvMHvZ8klbJTHS4YOBZOGVtYAC3CJ+4ZLVEapkYMSzZJYLuAF jPF4Z1EZ3EbCkhkXmNTuu22Cx2n8XpQ/n19q2rCSCFtUmhL6c867gRtdHDBVmVaV y7I3filtqHjO =V66d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-IcVfIKVxaX/0vR3qpmhV--