Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1115 bytes --]

On pią, 2017-06-02 at 04:56 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions?
> 
> 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php-
> like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by 
> neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules for 
> each of vim they want) from Ciaran's suggestion of making a directory common 
> for all vims, patch all the vims, and force *developers* to check modules and 
> put them there only after check modules under both (currently) vims (as side 
> effect leave neovim users without modules until developers finaly finish that 
> work).
> 
> And what point they (participants) really supports?

Just FYI, I'm strongly against eselect modules (and any user code) that
writes into /usr (except for /usr/local). This directory should be
reserved for package manager control, and files in it should be
registered in vdb.

> 
> 3) Again, dear Vim Team, please come here, and take a part in the discussion.
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 988 bytes --]