From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34DE139694 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91386E0DD0; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46107E0C7C for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E28C341710; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1493386635.3838.0.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Providing consistent means to enable tests requiring Internet access From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:37:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170429012507.0deaf24c@katipo2.lan> References: <1493302453.1189.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170429012507.0deaf24c@katipo2.lan> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XAF5nTDwVWXFVxNjPoJe" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 5e31f3fe-2bf7-46ee-bdae-353b9898a5b9 X-Archives-Hash: c92fa8b88e5dda27c066caf474e4bb58 --=-XAF5nTDwVWXFVxNjPoJe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On sob, 2017-04-29 at 01:25 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > I know you're vying for "a small incremental step that just fixes this on= e niche", > but this is basically a problem that's been known ( at least by me ) for = many years, > and we're in growing need of a real solution, not a small incremental hac= k that is > a disservice to the future we know exists. Congratulations, you've just completely discouraged me from pursuing this any further. I don't have the time or the resources to solve all the problems in the world, especially if I don't give a damn about them. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-XAF5nTDwVWXFVxNjPoJe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEXr8g+Zb7PCLMb8pAur8dX/jIEQoFAlkDRYtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDVF QkYyMEY5OTZGQjNDMjJDQzZGQ0E0MEJBQkYxRDVGRjhDODExMEEACgkQur8dX/jI EQrCSRAAiVYftCoBBQk2VK16itdFtyPbYCkaEtA4rXdOs/HFnx/PE3gVB5N5XYAb b+u6SWH3jjEqI6EMBE9RuoNjiblQDM1z43da6JLqgIqLz0kUq1IP1GCbaVLNy5vO QBSraU1N7PcvWFHRyuTSvLVZz//ErdrUHaoRgt6ICNAEmDsw46Qe+q/KdTVuU/dd /QgCvu61FJQWFa+2nRumRuMHv+GXagl7/p8e8rKs1eViXEU1J2/rbUmJI01/L/P+ 6JCkESSlquCkOcm1g5Fsb6rUZDKNzOhi8mDSZK+0qElLfg9SUcQMETLQtssk5nKh j9eaMEzR4k+80g09z5FI9daA9TxMX2etrdlZcd2X8VSL4XzeanyaJ1TW1lAq3aTI HVuW1mpNGAF3Z2IIA0gPBWbVhV9G3JuGjQF3b5sfxmWVO3jQ6t8THM+bJ/gFKS5V sbA9GHyeW3UmpOFqWRV8BKhWEsbAIKKsKkQdIExeCGl5EXGJVsrusE+wDFVqwoDq 331sVCxJriVBi+WTX8oueM66A0Cr25L1xfQ3/hOZ1+6RS/Q1W/5TrLnqfdrf4Ai/ aqD5qZNKMWqRwGLSx7LvWPmSt/M8Xh91MKyCrQRcK7j58MXDQnJGCQ+yPzKRyfTN Qnac4i+otEULb+IzuKoGoJYwNVbGSMsKhkpmtRWgWVBElWEC1Pk= =2oVK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XAF5nTDwVWXFVxNjPoJe--