public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:51:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492728706.1718.1.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420221753.GB28261@waltdnes.org>

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 20.04.2017 kell 18:17, kirjutas Walter Dnes:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote
> > 
> > The default is new:
> > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++1
> > 1-abi.html
> 
>   And the news item says...
> 
> > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
> 
> ...which means that people like me, who currently have 4.9.4, won't
> know
> about it until after the fact.  Then they'd have to...

You will still have 4.9.4 until you unmerge it, and will still use
4.9.4 until you gcc-config to gcc5.

> GCC 5.4 Status: 2016-06-03 (regression fixes & docs only).
> 
> GCC 6.3 Status: 2016-12-21 (regression fixes & docs only). 
> 
> GCC 7.1 Status: 2017-04-20 (frozen, all changes require RM approval).
> 
> Development: GCC 8.0 Status: 2017-04-20 (regression fixes & docs
> only).

Notice how 4.9 isn't even mentioned there as receiving regression fixes
or whatnot anymore.

>   Maybe we should what many enterprises do with Windows; i.e. skip a
> version and go straight to gcc-6.

No. Maybe with gcc 5 to 7.


Other than that, I am terribly sorry for your inconvenience. But 2014
called and wanted its compiler back :(  So we are "bleeding edge" again



  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-18  8:15 [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18  8:37 ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18  9:16   ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18  9:44     ` Mart Raudsepp
2017-04-18 11:07       ` M. J. Everitt
2017-04-18 12:44     ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18 13:12       ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 13:27         ` James Le Cuirot
2017-04-18 13:38           ` Aaron W. Swenson
2017-04-18 14:12           ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 14:40         ` [gentoo-dev] " Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18 14:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tomas Mozes
2017-04-19  7:31   ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-19  9:22     ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-19 18:25       ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-20  5:36         ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-20 22:17           ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-20 22:51             ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2017-04-20 22:52             ` Matthias Maier
2017-04-21  1:44               ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-21 16:21                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-21 19:29                   ` Francesco Riosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492728706.1718.1.camel@gentoo.org \
    --to=leio@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox