From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:51:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492728706.1718.1.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420221753.GB28261@waltdnes.org>
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 20.04.2017 kell 18:17, kirjutas Walter Dnes:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote
> >
> > The default is new:
> > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++1
> > 1-abi.html
>
> And the news item says...
>
> > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
>
> ...which means that people like me, who currently have 4.9.4, won't
> know
> about it until after the fact. Then they'd have to...
You will still have 4.9.4 until you unmerge it, and will still use
4.9.4 until you gcc-config to gcc5.
> GCC 5.4 Status: 2016-06-03 (regression fixes & docs only).
>
> GCC 6.3 Status: 2016-12-21 (regression fixes & docs only).
>
> GCC 7.1 Status: 2017-04-20 (frozen, all changes require RM approval).
>
> Development: GCC 8.0 Status: 2017-04-20 (regression fixes & docs
> only).
Notice how 4.9 isn't even mentioned there as receiving regression fixes
or whatnot anymore.
> Maybe we should what many enterprises do with Windows; i.e. skip a
> version and go straight to gcc-6.
No. Maybe with gcc 5 to 7.
Other than that, I am terribly sorry for your inconvenience. But 2014
called and wanted its compiler back :( So we are "bleeding edge" again
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 8:15 [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 8:37 ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18 9:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 9:44 ` Mart Raudsepp
2017-04-18 11:07 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-04-18 12:44 ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18 13:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 13:27 ` James Le Cuirot
2017-04-18 13:38 ` Aaron W. Swenson
2017-04-18 14:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-18 14:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tomas Mozes
2017-04-18 14:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tomas Mozes
2017-04-19 7:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-19 9:22 ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-19 18:25 ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-20 5:36 ` Tomas Mozes
2017-04-20 22:17 ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-20 22:51 ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2017-04-20 22:52 ` Matthias Maier
2017-04-21 1:44 ` Walter Dnes
2017-04-21 16:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jörg Schaible
2017-04-21 19:29 ` Francesco Riosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492728706.1718.1.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=leio@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox