From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80299-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECB6139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:44:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C920E0DED;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4A4E0DA4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.10] (85.253.85.240.cable.starman.ee [85.253.85.240])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: leio)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5352A33E4AD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1492508657.18287.1.camel@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:44:17 +0300
In-Reply-To: <od4ln4$a1r$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org>
	 <CAG6MAzSUqBS-qzRmETT3u48B=KXBQ0KjMQPqXLO=JDBmKjiv+g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <od4ln4$a1r$1@blaine.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: cc4a7900-c1c4-40ac-a7fe-da9ae3ca7209
X-Archives-Hash: 9702a90cdecaa99d5cdfeae0722184fd

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 18.04.2017 kell 11:16, kirjutas Jörg Schaible:
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> Tomas Mozes wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> > joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
> > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showm
> > > sg=1
> > > 
> > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable
> > > for me.
> > > Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird,
> > > because
> > > there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and
> > > one
> > > unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
> > > 
> > > Can someone shed some light on this?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jörg
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is
> > probably related to:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612178
> 
> Amd64.
> 
> Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my
> machine 
> lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild
> available 
> over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS.
> 
> Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain
> why 
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc lists the same
> version 
> more than once.

This is a packages.gentoo.org Ruby on Rails webapp bug, and has
absolutely nothing to do with some package being stable on an
architecture or not. Don't let that disturb you.


Mart